Hi everybody. I'm sorry for my very bad english and I apologize. Nobody reacted to my previous post. Did somebody understood my message? I was stating that the misses for the Elenin-Sun-Earth conjunctions and the (possibly) related earthquakes (Chili, Christchurch (NZ) and Japan) were bigger than it seems, because the three objects are in movement and don't wait on each other, stillstanding, for the conjunction to be. Accordingly, the quasi-conjunctions were in fact misses of weeks or months. But nobody seemed interested. So I will continue to develop my argumentation and speculations... Maybe it will then meet more interest... First hypothesis: if the Elenin predicted trajectory is correct, but not the timing, the Elenin object could be delayed compared with the JPL simulation (intentionally miscalculated or not, because it seems that a 200.000 km object (brown dwarf) would intuitively not be so much accelerated by the sun (and perhaps would accelerate also the sun's and earth's trajectory) at the perihelion and would loose less speed to the aphelion, compared to a comet-like object (5-60 km) ) - or would the trajectory be exactly the same?? If Terral or Rob could possibly answer that question, please! Second hypothesis: there's an other invisible object following Elenin on the same trajectory causing the earthquake and Elenin was a little interstellar object pulled by an incoming brown dwarf in our direction.
If one of the two hypothesis is correct, the second conjunction (normally predicted for Sept 27th) would then occur one month later and Elenin (or Nibiru?) could pass much nearer (and also much father) from earth. At the very worst, if the Elenin object would be 13 days delayed on the same JPL trajectory, the conjunction would occur in the end of October and Elenin (or the brown dwarf) would cross earth's orbit later and pass very near from earth (near or less than 0.001 UA) between November 1st and 2nd. Since the comet gets faster than earth, but on a approaching and then remaining parallel to the sun trajectory, lightly above the ecliptical plane, but very near, so the conjunction could last two or three days long. If the Elenin object would be a brown dwarf twice the size of Jupiter, we should have a spendid and unique NIBIRU ECLIPSE, PERHAPS THREE DAYS DURING. Il would be like a super lunar eclipse, but possibly much darker, since the brown dwarf would absorb sunlight more than the moon does, if Terral's theory about the brown dwarfs is correct. It would be consistent with one of the end-date for the Mayan calendar (28 OCTOBER 2011 according to Carl Calleman and the elders of the mayan concil), with the apocalyptical prediction of THE THREE DAYS OF DARKNESS by several sources (including an image of the Nostradamus's Lost Book (p.70; set of three eclipse's designs) and the "Mushroom" crop circle from Rough Hill, Wiltshire, 24th June 2009 (set of three similar eclipse's designs), and finally also with the FATIMA vision (13 Oct. 1917 in Portugal, seen by more than 10.000 people, who observed the sun becoming dark red, orbiting rapidly counterclockwise on itself (cf. also Norwegian spiral and red spots of Jupiter) and ALMOST falling onto earth). In his letter to the King Henri II, Nostradamus also mentionned:
..."This will be preceded by a solar eclipse more dark and gloomy than any since the creation of the world, except that after the death and passion of Jesus Christ. And it will be in the month of October than [a] (in french:"quelque") great translation (cf. pole shift?) will be made and it will be such that one will think the gravity of the earth has lost its natural movement and that it is to be plunged into the abyss of perpetual darkness. In the spring there will be omens (arctic spring two days earlier in Ulullisat, Greenland?), and thereafter extreme changes, reversals of realms (arab spring?) and [a] mighty earthquake (Japan?)"...(in french:"par grand tremblement de terre").
But that's only doomsday's fantasy, marial apocalyptical predictions, Nostradamus eculubrations and nothing empirical seems to confirm this possibility. But if the professional disinformators have done a good job, anything would seem almost normal, almost!!?? Our job consists in noting the rare false notes and to read between the lines to complete the pattern. The only element tending in that direction is that, if the Elenin (or Nibiru)-earth-sun alignements have actually caused the Chilian, Christchurch and Japanese earthquakes, Elenin (or Nibiru) is now in fact delayed comparing with the JPL predicted trajectory and it seems that the delay is now reducing (Chili: +66 jours; Christchurch: -46 days; Japan: -36 days; end October: -x days??). And there's also little object(s) seemingly orbiting the comet on many of the comet's images by Gustavo Muler (who indicates cleary asteroids when present). And finally, the momentanous lack of tail (I've read that the comets usually have a significant tail when they meet the Jupiter's orbit and it is now near of the orbit of Mars). Until then, we'll only have to watch carefully whether the comet observations would effectively corroborate the predicted JPL ephemeris. But is Gustavo rather a pseudo-independant or a pseudo-"collaborator" observer. Or was? No news and no new pictures by Gustavo Muler since the 7th of May. Very strange! He published more than 10 Elenin's photos and animations, with seemingly orbiting objects, in March and April. And why hasn't one single picture from a big telescope or Hubble been published on the net up to now, to clearly debunk the whole thing? Many questions!! Has someone anwers or a hint?