David Wilcox is interesting in the same way David Icke is - they do shotgun assertions.
Well, I'm attempting to track down an article that I read by Wilcox, and it causes me not to trust him much.
And I have to ask, how stupid would you have to be to go public with arrest intentions of such pwoerful people BEFORE you have them in custody?
Well, this is one suspicion; I have to admit that the public relations of: We'll have troops supporting the integration efforts of veterans, Federal Marshals, and law enforcement that effectively close down the border for 3 days and may disrupt supplies as well as advocates essentially citizens and residents to effectively stay out of their way.
Frankly, if it wasn't for governmental institutions who ordinarily aren't meant to be heavily armed is arming and purchasing large portions of firearm munitions and armored stands, I deeply question this. Considering, the interview focuses on the 'Illuminati' are just pencil pushers, and there isn't likely to be any gun play/firefights; I have some concerns and suspicions here. This doesn't suggest a peaceful transition will occur, and I don't trust the whole 'Don't worry, we're here to help, and if you don't believe us your part of the Illuminati' doesn't sit well with me. Not to mention, this seems reminiscent of "3 Days in May" to me...http://freedomreigns.us/ALERTS.html
Government have been
running the world and doing
In various mechanisms, I think that quite a few people would agree here via the Public-Private Partnership, bailouts, and etc.
White hats including old
money, military, veterans,
federal marshals, and local
law officials are going to
Integration of Local, State, and Federal law enforcement institutions along with veterans and military. Considering, the path trend trajectory of the welfare state and globalization particularly after 9/11 encompasses a Police State aka security/well being or welfare. This is rather fishy.
Media may say it’s martial
law and try to spread
panic, but the actions are
lawful and benefit
Considering, there are many governmental agencies from DHS to some rather mundane Federal institutions are arming and gathering munitions; I can't say that it'd be surprising Media portraying it as martial law. However, how precisely are we the populace being reassured? We are being soothed that innocents will not be targeted, and the resistance claims to possess a stronger hand and resist such 'loyalists', yet this is being sold as a 'cleanse' as stated here:http://freedomreigns.us/ALERTS.html
First we must Cleanse.
Cleanse sounds good until we also note the historical precedents via ethnic cleansing, liquidate, purge, eliminate, and etc.http://divinecosmos.com/start-here/davi ... ervention1
Martial law will NOT be declared when this happens.
Path trend trajectory through the Welfare State actually suggests that the desired goal is an encompassed Police State particularly after 9/11. It's incredibly unlikely that unless the fail-safe declaration of martial law is necessary; it won't be declared. This isn't what I'd call reassuring.
The military will NOT take control of the government.
And, what exactly is going to replace those arrested within government until reelections occur?
Innocent civilians will NOT be imprisoned or harmed in any way.
Considering, the path trend trajectory and the focus of the article. I would highly doubt that innocent people will not be targeted. I'd wager the target audience for Wilcox article here with 'Drake' (?) would be Occupy Wall Street who predominantly targets Wall Street and etc, which according to Washington's Blog rather mirrors the underlining here. Acolyte pointed out not long ago pieces of legislation seems to be pointed towards OWS, and veterans have come forward to back them as well. If nothing else, it'll be interesting, but I have doubts given the path trend trajectory here and other trends.
Any troops who attempt to carry out unlawful orders of this sort, on behalf of the "bad guys," will be outnumbered and resisted.
For a group of people who claim to have a very thoroughly planned scenario, which evidently is believed to need to be adjusted after the first engagement, and openly call for initially cleansing that apparently won't be very thorough initially. Oops. First we need to cleanse, but we may not after possessing a thoroughly detailed strategy in place be as thorough. If we miss any 'Public-Private Partnership' advocates within our ranks of this largely independent group think 'illuminati', they'll be outnumbered and resisted. I could be wrong, but this sounds like a hap-hazard or ad hoc strategy that increases the chances of failure. Wasn't that part of the plot to Hunger Games, the government initially faced a resistance group who ultimately failed, and the government have the policy of making the citizens/residents pay by offering old style bread and circuses called the 'Hunger Games' as a result.
The Pentagon "good guys" are now in full political and logistical cooperation with a remarkable 134-nation alliance -- to bring the perpetrators to justice and free our planet.
Military politicians good guys? Or, does this have more to do with the present administration causing a rift between the military and Federal workers under the basis of benefits, which appear to indeed aim to unionize the US military as this effect seems to result through Federal worker unions.
International travel will
be stopped for 3 days.
Some facilities wired to
explode will be off limits
The borders are sealed, so they don't escape the pincers? How exactly is this any different than the plan to seal the border, so people can't opt out of an increasingly expansive system? The person's word and those who 'vetted' him?
Wouldn't the principle be to uphold the Constitution that if they choose to escape and further minimize disruptions to societies' structure be considered a higher priority than to in essence through these years largely be a coil on the snake presently moving to eat itself? It's not like if the plan fails like it almost sounds like with its statements and then disclaimers; sealing the border along the plans of martial law and accepted by the populace/encouraged populace should the strategy if accurate prove to be a failure would render the US fully implemented Police State for all purposes over night.
'So and so escaped arrest, according to radar he/she will be entering your airspace in xxx time frame; it's your call.'
The goal is to transition
peacefully and safely.
There will likely be
disruptions in local travel,
food supply, water supply,
and electricity. Make sure
you have necessities for 72
hours and ideally 30 days.
'Don't worry, we're here to help, but we may disrupt supply chains in the process causing supply shortages that may result in shocks, so please stock up and allow us to do this'. How exactly does that quote not mean that in how it's written? It's reads like a bait and switch, and it encourages people to support integration, which actually doesn't change a thing.
Remain calm. Support the
troops and law officers
that are arresting
thousands of criminals
guilty of heinous crimes
against us all.
Really. In the following section:
Don’t believe that every
one of them is as guilty as
the leaders. Some were
forced to act and were
threatened with torture.
First, the interview states that there is no leaders; the group is of various independent groups. So, what leaders is this referring to?
Second, if there's no leaders, how can one claim that people should support the troops and officers here who possesses a strategy in which their own ranks haven't been certainly routed of supporters, and the people arrested are indeed guilty aka guilty until proven innocent of heinous crimes against 'humanity'? Then, the following quote discusses that not everyone were willful participants through coercion and torturehttp://divinecosmos.com/start-here/davi ... ervention1
In her radio interview with Greg Szymanski, Svali revealed that all members are forced to endure human sacrifice rituals that are conducted in the Vatican -- in a secret subterranean chamber, accessed by a door hidden behind a giant painting.
If I understand the structure correctly, the structure uses abuse in which advocates seeking promotion to avoid being abused, but it also encourages to encourage abuse of underlings in which prompts them to seek to rise in the ranks that includes the individual group's high structure as well. So, if we are to believe in this premise of mass arrests, we also must see innocents who were otherwise coerced or tortured through mechanisms like MK-Ultra/Monarch Mind Control aka trauma based dissociation disorder, which structurally would be rather problematic with the arrests as well.
So, they are guilty of heinous crimes, but Social-Darwinism requires to be taken into account?
Research stories on the
internet to assure yourself
that the arresters are good
and the arrestees are bad.
Why exactly should we take this at face value? Plenty of research indicates the path trend trajectory, and I largely am hesitant to endorse a plan that makes establishing a Police State in full implementation particularly if this is true and fails.
Don’t turn on each other.
Don’t run into a bank and
start shooting people.
Isn't this common sense?
Everything will be ok. The world is about to go into a Golden Age. First we must Cleanse.
1). The everything is fine and here to help would be less disconcerting without the disclaimers of possessing a more less detailed strategy than advertised, and the strategy itself mirroring the path trend trajectory quite well.
2). This strategy by no means guarantees a golden age. In fact, the door is wide open for a Dystopian/Dark Age. Why precisely does this strategy seem to so heavily mirror the activation of a Police State particularly around the Occultic significant transition of Aquarius? Why would mirroring the strategy be vital if the resistance outnumber the 'loyalists'? It simply doesn't make any sense from the prospective that the interview particularly in Wilcox's viewpoint of this negative being an ends to a means or effectively the ends justifies the means. Personally, this fortifies my suspicions on Wilcox accurately being CIA who if I recall in a previous article; the CIA ran the numbers on an major attack and are the 'good guys', which is mentioned in the article that I'm having difficulty in locating... Interesting isn't it?
3). This last statement raises my suspicions more than anything. First, it's interchangeable with liquidated, eliminated, purged, and etc, and the sentence is structured in a very similar manner to historical precedent.
At this point, I think that this is a bait and switch.
The bait is to advertise thoroughly dismantling this rather Dystopian system.
The switch is that to dismantle the system; despite, outnumbering the enemy we need to mirror their strategy as a means to justify the end.
'I fear the Greeks even when bearing gifts' seems to be quite apt here, and the ends that justifies the means here truly does look like a Greek bearing a gift to the Trojans who are increasingly watchful here. In my viewpoint, I'd say if this gets enough support; Troy will be destroyed (or should I pronounce it des-troy [Interesting isn't it: De-stroy V Des-Troy?]).